Link Building Services
Manual outreach, digital PR and mention-building for companies that need to be cited by Google and by AI assistants. We will also tell you when links are the wrong thing to buy, which is more often than the industry admits.
Three reasons people buy links, and what each one actually needs
Only one of these is a link building problem. Read all three before you brief anyone.
This is the legitimate case, but the weighting has changed and Google has said so on the record. Links work best alongside the content they point at, which is why we usually scope this next to SEO services rather than in isolation.
The measured signal here is being talked about, not being linked to. Buying backlinks is close to the weakest lever available for this, and the work belongs with our AI SEO, AEO and GEO services.
Google devalues most manipulative links rather than penalising the site they point at, and its own guidance is that almost nobody needs the disavow tool. We would rather say that plainly than sell you a cleanup retainer.
What actually changed about links
Four findings, all traceable to sources at the foot of this page. Two of them are inconvenient for anyone selling link packages, including us.
Google has publicly downgraded links, repeatedly and on the record.
In 2016 a Google search quality strategist named links as one of the three most important ranking factors. At PubCon in September 2023, Google's Gary Illyes was asked whether that still held and said it did not, adding that people overestimate links and that they had not been in the top three for some time. In March 2024, alongside a core update, Google edited its own spam policy documentation: the sentence describing links as an important factor in determining relevance had the word "important" removed. In April 2024, at a conference in Bulgaria, Illyes said "We need very few links to rank pages" and confirmed the remark afterwards on X, adding that he probably should not have said it.
Around the same time John Mueller advised that over-focusing on links tends to waste effort that would improve the site more if spent elsewhere. None of this means links stopped working. It means the industry is still pricing them as though it were 2014.
The trap: treating a link count as the deliverable. If the number of links is the product, the vendor is incentivised toward the cheapest links that clear a metric, which is exactly the pattern Google's spam policy describes.
For AI visibility, unlinked mentions beat backlinks by a wide margin.
Ahrefs studied 75,000 brands in December 2025, measuring which signals correlate with being mentioned across ChatGPT, Google AI Mode and AI Overviews. YouTube mentions correlated most strongly at around 0.737. Branded web mentions followed at 0.66 to 0.71. Branded anchors, meaning links where the visible text is your brand name, ranged from 0.511 to 0.628. Domain Rating landed at 0.266 to 0.326, and raw backlink counts and URL Rating were reported only as very weak.
Read the order carefully. Being discussed on the web outranks being linked from it. A mention in a well-watched video in your category is a stronger measured signal than a batch of links from sites picked for their Domain Rating. Ahrefs also found almost no relationship between the number of pages on a site and AI visibility, which is a caution against solving this with programmatic content too.
Stated by the researchers: correlation is not causation. These are patterns in what visible brands have in common, not proof that buying the signal produces the visibility.
Links still matter, but through rankings rather than directly.
The case for links has not collapsed, it has moved. A separate Ahrefs study of 1.9 million citations from one million AI Overviews found that 76 percent of cited pages already ranked in Google's top ten. So the chain runs one way: authority helps a page rank, ranking makes it eligible to be cited, and citation is where visibility now lives.
That is a much narrower claim than the one most link building pages make, and it changes what you should buy. Links pointed at pages that could plausibly rank are an investment. Links pointed at a page with nothing to say are a cost. This is why we look at the target page before quoting, and why link work is often better sequenced after the content it is meant to support exists.
Worth knowing: Domain Rating and Domain Authority are third-party scores built by Ahrefs and Moz. Google neither publishes nor ranks by them. Ahrefs says openly that DR ignores link spam, and that a large volume of low-quality backlinks can push a site's DR up rather than down. So a high DR is not proof a site is clean, and pricing a link by DR alone rewards exactly the sites you should be screening out.
Bad links are mostly devalued, not punished.
In July 2025 John Mueller addressed whether a wave of spammy backlinks would affect a site during a core update. His position was that core updates build on longer-term data, so something very recent is unlikely to play a role, and that he could not see how such links would factor in. On the disavow tool he was blunter still: it does what it says, almost nobody needs it, and he noted that pushing it as a service to everyone reveals something about the SEO offering it.
We are repeating that because it costs us revenue to do so. A large share of the link auditing and disavow market exists to solve a problem most sites do not have. If your rankings fell, the cause is more likely to be content, intent or a core update than a competitor pointing junk at you.
The exception: if you previously bought links at scale yourself, that is a different conversation and worth an honest look. Inherited spam from someone else's campaign usually is not.
The tactics, and how much risk each one carries
Every link type our current service page lists, with our honest read on where it sits against Google's spam policy.
| What it is | Policy risk | |
|---|---|---|
| Digital PR and outreach | Earning coverage by giving a publication something genuinely worth writing about | Lowest |
| Unlinked mention reclamation | Finding places you are already named and asking for the link | Lowest |
| Broken link building | Finding dead links on relevant pages and offering a live replacement | Low |
| Resource and directory links | Placement on genuine industry resource pages | Low to moderate |
| Editorial and guest placements | Articles published on third-party sites, covered on our guest posting page | Moderate, scale-dependent |
| White label links for agencies | Outreach delivered under another agency's brand | Inherits the brief it is given |
| Bulk link packages | A fixed monthly quota of links at a fixed price | High |
| PBNs, Web 2.0s, link farms | Networks built to pass authority rather than to be read | Not offered |
Risk ratings are our editorial judgement against Google's published link spam policy, not a guarantee. Google's policy names large-scale article and guest posting campaigns with keyword-rich anchor text as a link scheme.
Why a fixed monthly quota is the risky one
It is the least intuitive row in that table, because a fixed quota looks like the most accountable way to buy. The problem is what it does to the incentive. A vendor committed to twenty links a month must find twenty regardless of whether twenty genuinely relevant opportunities existed that month, and the shortfall gets made up from whatever is available. Google's policy language turns on scale plus optimised anchor text, and a quota manufactures both. We would rather commit to an outreach effort and report honestly on what it earned.
How we run link building
The six stages currently described on our service page, in order.
- Discovery and analysis. We analyse your site and your competitors' backlink profiles to identify the opportunities that actually exist in your niche, rather than starting from a target number.
- Strategy development. Based on that analysis we build a link strategy aligned to your business goals, including which pages are worth pointing authority at and which are not ready yet.
- Content creation. Our copywriters produce the material the outreach depends on. Nothing gets pitched without something worth publishing behind it, which is where our copywriting and content marketing work overlaps with this service.
- Outreach and placement. We approach relevant sites manually. This stage takes as long as it takes, because placement depends on the other side's availability and editorial appetite, not on our schedule.
- Quality assurance. Every placement is vetted before it counts. We avoid sites with a respectable score that got there through redirect tricks or private blog networks, because a good number on a bad domain is worth nothing.
- Reporting and monitoring. You get monthly reporting on links acquired, where they sit, the anchor text used, and what moved. Where nothing moved, the report says so.
What we verified, and what we will not claim
Every external figure on this page was checked against its primary source on 8 August 2026.
- The correlation figures come from Ahrefs' December 2025 study of 75,000 brands, which states its own method and its own caution that correlation is not causation.
- Google's positions on links are taken from its published spam policy documentation and from reported remarks by named Google staff, each linked below.
- The service stages and tactic list above are carried over from our existing link building page. They describe how we say we work.
What we could not verify, and what nobody can promise
We cannot tell you how many links you need, and neither can anyone else. There is no published number, and the question assumes a relationship that Google itself has spent three years describing as weaker than the industry believes. Any vendor quoting a link count that produces a ranking is quoting a number they invented.
We also will not promise a position, a Domain Rating increase, or a traffic figure. Domain Rating is a third-party score we do not control and Google does not use. Placements depend on editors we do not employ. And the two most-cited signals for AI visibility, mentions and video presence, are earned rather than bought.
On price, the open market for individual placements broadly runs from about $100 to $500 per link, with bespoke programmes running into the thousands per month. We quote after a scoping call rather than from a rate card, because the same brief costs very different amounts depending on your sector and how competitive the placements are.
Frequently asked questions
Including the ones that are awkward for an agency selling this service.
Is building backlinks safe for my website?
Yes, when the links are genuinely editorial. Google's spam policies prohibit buying or selling links that pass ranking credit, excessive link exchanges, automated link creation, and large-scale article or guest posting campaigns built around keyword-rich anchor text. The line is intent and scale rather than format. A relevant placement on a site whose readers would care about you is safe. A monthly quota of placements carrying commercial anchor text is the pattern the policy was written to catch, whoever is selling it.
How long before link building shows results?
Typically three to six months, and the range is wide for real reasons. Placement itself can take weeks because it depends on an editor's schedule. After that the page has to be crawled, the link has to be assessed, and any ranking effect competes with everything else on the results page. Your sector, your competition and your site's existing authority all move the timeline. If someone promises movement in 30 days, ask what they are actually buying to make that happen.
Do backlinks still matter for SEO in 2026?
They matter, but less than the industry prices them at, and Google has said so directly. Gary Illyes stated in 2023 that links are not in the top three ranking factors and had not been for some time, and in 2024 that Google needs very few links to rank pages. In March 2024 Google removed the word "important" from its own documentation describing links as a relevance factor. Links still help a page rank, and ranking still gates whether you get cited in AI answers. That is a real reason to do this work, and a poor reason to buy links by the dozen.
Will backlinks get my brand mentioned by ChatGPT or AI Overviews?
Only indirectly, and less than almost anything else you could spend the money on. In Ahrefs' study of 75,000 brands, YouTube mentions correlated with AI visibility at roughly 0.737 and branded web mentions at 0.66 to 0.71, while Domain Rating sat at 0.266 to 0.326 and raw backlink counts were weaker still. If AI visibility is the actual goal, the brief is to get talked about across credible sources, not to acquire links. We would rather scope that honestly than sell you a link package for a job it does not do.
Do I need to disavow bad backlinks pointing at my site?
Almost certainly not. Google's John Mueller has said the disavow tool does what it says but that almost nobody needs it, and he has pointedly noted that agencies pushing it as a service to everyone are revealing something about themselves. He has also said core updates build on longer-term data, so a recent burst of spam links is unlikely to be what moved your rankings. The realistic exception is a site that previously bought links at scale itself. Inherited junk from somebody else's campaign is usually best ignored.
What makes a backlink valuable?
Relevance first, then whether a human editor genuinely chose to place it. A link from a modest site whose readers are your buyers is worth more than one from a high-scoring site with no connection to your sector. Context matters too: a link inside the body of a relevant article carries more weight than one in a footer or author bio. Treat Domain Rating and Domain Authority as shortlisting tools only. They are third-party scores from Ahrefs and Moz rather than anything Google publishes, and Ahrefs itself notes that DR ignores spam and can be inflated by a pile of low-quality links.
How much does link building cost?
Across the open market, individual placements broadly run from about $100 to $500 each, and managed programmes run into the thousands per month. We do not publish a rate card because the same brief prices very differently by sector: a placement in a competitive finance or health publication costs a multiple of one in a niche trade title. You get a fixed quote after a scoping call, and it does not move unless the scope does.
What is in a link building report?
New links acquired, the sites they sit on, the anchor text used, the state of outreach still in progress, and any ranking movement over the period. We include the outreach that did not convert as well, because a report showing only wins hides the cost of the ones that failed and makes it impossible to judge whether the programme is working.
Do you offer white label link building for agencies?
Yes, delivered under your brand. The one thing worth flagging is that white label work inherits whatever brief it is given. If your client expects a fixed monthly quota with commercial anchor text, that risk transfers to their site regardless of whose logo is on the report. We are happy to have that conversation with you before the programme starts rather than after.
Find out whether links are the right spend for you
A scoping call ends with a written scope and a fixed number. If the honest answer is that mentions, content or conversion work would move your business further, we will say that instead.
Book a free consultationWhere link building fits with everything else
Off-site authority rarely works alone. These are the services and articles it sits closest to.
Sources
- Top Brand Visibility Factors in ChatGPT, AI Mode and AI Overviews — Ahrefs, 12 December 2025 (75,000 brands, Spearman correlation)
- 76% of AI Overview Citations Pull From the Top 10 — Ahrefs, 21 July 2025 (1.9 million citations from 1 million AI Overviews)
- Google Confirms Links Are Not That Important — Search Engine Journal, 22 April 2024 (Illyes at SERPConf, and the March 2024 documentation change)
- Links Are Not a Top 3 Google Search Ranking Factor, Says Gary Illyes — Search Engine Land, September 2023
- John Mueller: Core Updates Build on Long-Term Data — Search Engine Journal, 1 July 2025 (link spam and the disavow tool)
- Spam Policies for Google Web Search — Google Search Central (link schemes)
- A Reminder About Links in Large-Scale Article Campaigns — Google Search Central Blog, 25 May 2017
- Domain Rating: What It Is and What It's Good For — Ahrefs (on DR being a third-party metric)
